“Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.” The White House, Oct. 2022, www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Blueprint-for-an-AI-Bill-of-Rights.pdf. 

“Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.” The White House, The United States Government, 22 Nov. 2023, www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/. 

Hlr. “Voluntary Commitments from Leading Artificial Intelligence Companies On.” Harvard Law Review, The Harvard Law Review Association, 10 Feb. 2024, harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-on-july-21-2023/.

  • This source is an online section of the Harvard Law Review, volume 137, issue 4. The Harvard Law Review is a “student-run journal of legal scholarship” in association with Harvard University. This particular article within the journal responds to the commitment made by several AI companies while convening in the White House to develop a system, such as watermarking, to label AI generated content. Thus changing the way we currently understand Copyright law. It also responds in part to the AI Bill of Rights published under the Biden-Harris Administration. What the article proposes may very well be the solution for many unprecedented legal issues with AI. It would provide the courts with a standard by which such cases should be determined, as well as more clearly define the liability held by AI companies and consumers. It also explicates the strengths and weaknesses of the AI Bill of Rights, providing a nuanced understanding of the document.

Salazar, Maria, and Madeleine Dean. No AI Fraud Act, 10 Jan. 2024, dean.house.gov/_cache/files/7/7/77047f57-f9f8-4ddb-9385-f4f82c7d22fd/090C34FC92DED2E83456EB85C8E64E44.no-ai-fraud-act.pdf.

  • This source is the first draft of the proposed No AI Fraud Act as it currently exists. The No AI Fraud Act is a bipartisan bill presented by Representatives Maria Salazar and Madeleine Dean to the House on January 10th, 2024. Though it is still in the early stages of review and revision, if passed into law it would create a “federal framework to protect Americans’ individual right to their likeness and voice against AI generated fakes and forgeries.” At the very onset of the bill, Representatives Salazar and Dean detail the ethical dilemmas spurred by generative AI. Specifically, deepfakes. This source is particularly helpful, as it dictates legal and ethical issues with AI that have not yet been outwardly publicized by courts currently considering such cases.