A Look Into Daisy

Month: February 2025

The Tragic Ideal: Daisy Buchanan as the American Dream Personified

When we think of the American Dream—an ethos that promises opportunity, reinvention, and the manifestation of all one’s material desires through hard work—we often paint the picture of upward momentum. It starts with a new house, then a new car, some luxury clothes, an awe-inducing status, and overall a better life. Sounds too good to be true, right? Whether this ethos is attainable today remains a controversial debate among Americans. Although, some Americans hold onto it in hopes of climbing out of an unsatisfactory life with almost no regard of what it truly means or what it takes to bask in wealthy materialism.

In The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald takes this dream and turns it inside out, revealing what lies beneath its glitz and glamorous face. In the context of his novel, looming behind the mysticism of the American Dream is Daisy Buchanan: a woman who is a beautiful gem, elusive, and hollow. Her role in the story is not just a love interest or a passive character caught between two controlling men. She is the dream Gatsby longs for throughout the story and his entire character arc; she functions as an ideal that drove him to reshape his entire identity. To him, Daisy represents the American Dream: intoxicatingly beautiful, wealth to no end, prestige, and emotional fulfillment. But Fitzgerald rips off the veil of this fantasy by showing us that Daisy is not a dream fulfilled but rather a dream fabricated. She is more a symbol instead of a person; it is akin to a mirage created from the shimmering of a horizon. 

Ultimately, to Gatsby, Daisy is the dream. She is the trophy that symbolizes his years of ambition, discipline, and transformation. Gatsby reinvented himself, creates wealth (by criminal means), and buys a mansion that sits across the bay from her all of which are products of his hopeless pursuit of a love that he believes still exists and is up for reclamation. He believes that it still exists. It doesn’t. Fitzgerald makes it clear; the dream he is after is nothing more than an illusion, and Daisy, despite all of her charm and beauty, is not the ideal he imagines and sees her as.

Let’s examine one of the novel’s most famous lines of dialogue.

“I can’t say anything in his house, old sport.”

“She’s got an indiscreet voice,” I remarked. “It’s full of—” I hesitated.

“Her voice is full of money,” he said suddenly.

That was it. I’d never understood before. It was full of money—that was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the cymbals’ song of it… High in a white palace the king’s daughter, the golden girl…

This scene is jarring, not only because of its poetic sharpness, but for its truth. Gatsby’s sudden remark, “Her voice is full of money,” is more than a romantic observation. It’s a realization. It’s a revelation. In that moment, Gatsby has recognized what Daisy means to him and what she represents. It’s not love, it’s not longing, and it’s not even emotional fulfillment. It’s wealth, it’s status, and it’s privilege. It’s alluring. It’s intoxicating. Her voice being described with imagery like “the jingle of it” and “the cymbals’ song” does not just serve to be something poetically beautiful, it serves to exhibit a capitalized beauty. They’re the sounds of unattainable luxury wrapped in Daisy’s femininity.

From this, we as the readers can now see that Gatsby doesn’t just love Daisy. While by no doubt he loves her, he appears to be more in love with what she represents. She’s a dream; dreams can alter and manipulate an individual’s conscious will. Dreams are a one-sided relationship between itself and the dreamer. There is no sense of human connection; dreams are projections of our wants, shaped not by truth by our desires. In a metaphorical sense that strays away from the continuous usage of “dream,” Daisy is similar to a canvas to which Gatsby has smeared the colors and strokes of his life on. She is still an object either way regardless of what analogy you would like to use. Daisy does not exist as Daisy in The Great Gatsby; she exists as a personification of an ethos in the context of a man. 

Daisy Buchanan isn’t just the woman Gatsby loves; she’s the embodiment of everything he worked for. She’s a representation of his character arc. (Note: I wonder if The Great Gatsby passes the Bechdel Test…) Daisy is wealth, status, beauty, femininity, and not real in a figurative sense. She’s an illusion. The closest thing she is when it comes to offering any kind of fulfillment is the stale echo of it. It’s a lie, and lies are nothing more than stale sentiments. Is that her fault? Not necessarily. After all, she’s a dream invented by Gatsby. It’s through this way that Daisy becomes a symbol of the American Dream: captivating, glittering, and hollow.

In the end, Gatsby’s downfall and tragic conclusion was not solely due to lost love; it’s about paying the price of chasing a fantasy. Through Daisy, Fitzgerald makes a powerful reverberating statement: the American Dream may look satisfying, but more often than not, it is nothing more than a front to cover up its unstable foundation built upon tragedy, lies, and illusions.

Bibliography

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby.

1920s vs. 2020s: Would Daisy Have Made the Same Decisions?

I think I can speak for most people when I say that I was initially frustrated with Daisy’s indecisiveness when she was put in the middle of Gatsby and Tom. My thoughts were a constant mantra of, “Pick Gatsby! It’s so obvious who is the right one!” I was hoping she would do the “right” thing and leave Tom for Gatsby. It is easy to forget that the world of The Great Gatsby was real and experienced by many not so long ago. A century ago is a long time, but in the context of the United States, that is barely anything. The U.S. is a baby country, but I digress. Since the 1920s, American society has come a long way in its social norms, gender roles, and age-centered expectations. The power modern-day women have vs. their 1920 counterparts is noticeably different in response to century-long societal shifts. This large shift is what causes 21st century readers to root for Daisy and Gatsby’s fairytale ending. We idolize the Roaring 20s to no end, but more so its an idolization of what immediately comes to mind when thinking about it. What about the negative things not worthy of praising? How come Daisy didn’t choose Gatsby over Tom?

It makes sense of Daisy to run away with Gatsby, right? After all, Gatsby had finally made it and achieved the American Dream. He did it for her too! He carried himself up the social ladder, networked with people who were able to lift him up, swims in wealth and riches, is one of Long Island’s eligible and desirable bachelor’s, and he lives in a fantastical mansion. It is everything a girl could dream of! So why did she choose to stay with Tom? The answer is pretty and sadly simple. It is because she was a woman of the 1920s. It even shows how the book and the 2013 movie adaptation was presented. The conflict of Daisy choosing Tom or Gatsby was not even really about her. If anything, it showed the power of two men over one woman.

Tom wanted to retain his ultimate prize: the hand of Daisy.

Gatsby wanted to win his ultimate prize: the hand of Daisy.

Daisy was a symbol of proof of their American Dream. She was nothing more than a status symbol and a personified victory.

Likewise, Daisy knew and accepted this. This is why she chose to stay with Tom and turned a blind eye to the mess she caused after. Tom offered security; one she was already well familiar with. Tom Buchanan pleased her family back in Louisville. Her family would not take kindly to her deserting her marriage and running off with Gatsby. Society would not let a careless act like that go undetected. Daisy acted with the interests of Tom, her family, and the eyes of society in her mind. That is why she chose Tom over Gatsby.

What if Daisy did not feel these societal pressures? What if she lived in an era where she could move freely with significantly less scrutiny and control? Had Daisy lived in the 21st century, even in the 2020s, it is more likely and probable that she would have gone with Gatsby. While marriage is still a sacred and respected thing today, there have been significant social strides in regard to behaviors and acceptance towards divorce and acknowledgement of unhappy marriages. There would still be some scrutiny as we have not moved completely beyond the grip of the patriarchy, but her life would not have been over or ruined by any means. She more than likely would have been fine if she divorced Tom or left him. Love has been a lot more valued when couples are considering marriage; most people of today would sympathize with her. The idea of influence, marrying for the family, and preserving one’s status is a thing of the past or it is reserved for the highly affluent or royalty. Even if she were still rich, Daisy would not have to suffer too much in regard to the pressure of gender roles and social norms. They would not have nearly as much weight as they would in the 1920s. The weight of society is not nearly as heavy nowadays.

An Analysis of Daisy Buchanan: How the 1920s Shaped The Great Gatsby’s Most Controversial Character

To understand Daisy Buchanan, the woman that possesses Jay Gatsby’s heart, it is important to utilize the sociological imagination and insert oneself into the 1920s. Fitzgerald did not just create characters for a one-hit wonder novel; he created vessels that were products of his time. Fitzgerald lived during one of America’s most notable eras: the Roaring Twenties. The 1920s was a decade defined by its glamour, wealthy and social appeal, innovative nature, society-wide moral shifts, and confining social norms. Most of these characteristics of American society have either been lost or heavily diluted over the past century. For 21st century readers, it is natural for us to jump to criticize Daisy for her careless actions, shallowness, and indecisive nature. However, we live in an era where there is a lot more social fluidity. While modern women of today still suffer the consequences of their actions alongside the effects of modern-day patriarchy, the women of 1920s America were rigidly shackled by society with little to no wiggle room. Understanding the era and the world Daisy lived in reveals a lot of nuance to be considered.

Social Expectations & Gender Norms

Reading the novel we learn two things about Daisy Buchanan: her silent, strong love for Gatsby and the comfort her marriage to Tom Buchanan offers. Pre-The Great Gatsby and WWI, Daisy and Jay Gatsby fall deeply in love. Despite this indisputable fact, Daisy married Tom Buchanan while Gatsby was away. It is the classic, yet realistic, tragic romantic cliché: life goes on. Tom is a man of influence and wealth which Gatsby was not (yet). Daisy felt the social and familial pressures to let go of the past in order to wed a man that would be a good provider and bring honor to her family name. Marriage served more as a means of security, vanity, and obligation. While there is debate as to whether Daisy loves Tom or not, I believe it is safe to assume that she does love Tom; perhaps not as much as she did Gatsby. Regardless, marriage was still considered to be a woman’s ultimate goal despite the social norms surrounding it being viciously resisted and challenged. With these social factors being considered, is it really so strange that Daisy refused to run away with Gatsby despite their romance being suddenly rekindled five years after the fact?

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén