Course Blog

Month: May 2025

Misinformation in PR and Media

Misinformation

Misinformation is one of the biggest battles in today’s media news world. It has been a late trend in the last decade, and some might say it has divided the U.S. Misinformation has also affected people who work in the Public relations world. AI has also made it more difficult for people in PR to fight erroneous information by encouraging media literacy, guaranteeing openness, and offering fact-based information. However, there are ways to naviagate the new age of misinformation.

Photo Courtesy Science

Navagating Through Misinformation

In a time of disinformation, PR practitioners can use their communication abilities, media contacts, and strategic messaging to defend reputations and promote truth.  Proactively disseminating accurate, open, and timely information helps them to influence stories before lies take hold.  Monitoring digital platforms for developing disinformation lets them react quickly and fix errors. According to Nachshen (2023), “ As PR counselors, we can also help our organizations put systems and processes in place to monitor and detect misinformation, whether from AI or other sources. At the same time, organizations need to have a process to quickly validate information, because not every unflattering video will be a deepfake ( p.1).”   

Supporting consistent messaging and matching corporate behavior with declared principles also helps to foster confidence significantly.  Teaching media literacy and ethical communication to clients and stakeholders helps to strengthen integrity even further.  By doing this, PR experts become vital defenders of credibility in today’s complicated information environment. According to Nachshen (2023), ” We can also use our communications expertise to advise organizational leaders on how and when to respond to misinformation. We can pre-identify spokespeople and content distribution channels and help ensure the organizations we serve have plans in place to share timely and accurate information — assuming that it’s appropriate to do so (p.1).”

Photo Courtesy Stimson Center

The Negative Effects of Misinformation and Disinformation

Misinformation and disinformation weaken public trust and distort reality by disseminating inaccurate or misleading information that confuses audiences and reduces faith in reliable sources. Misformation—false information supplied without malicious intent—and disinformation—deliberately misleading information meant to deceive—cause communication difficulties for companies. The Commission on Information Disorder Final Report (2021, as cited in PRSA, 2021) Lying and distorting facts to sow mistrust has become a tactic of mainstream political and issue campaigns, it says. “Compounding the problem is the media’s continued repetition, amplification and rewarding of those who lie” by giving them high-profile coverage instead of providing the public with facts and holding liars to account ( The Aspen Institute). This trend is often seen a lot on FOX News, CNN, and MSNBC daily.

The rapid proliferation of such lies can drive companies into reactive crisis management, robbing resources from their main goal of harm control. The remaining effect of incorrect information can cause doubt among those who could doubt the company’s legitimacy, even after it has been fixed. PR professionals need to work together to prevent this from happening.

Sources

https://podcasts.apple.com/fi/podcast/the-rise-of-misinformation-and-what-it-means/id964108086?i=1000631924757
https://podcasts.apple.com/fi/podcast/truth-trust-trickery/id964108086?i=1000643704553

https://www.prsa.org/article/how-pr-pros-can-help-counter-ai-s-misinformation


Reputation and Relationships in PR

Standing on Social Issues

Organizations should take a stance on social issues such as racial justice, climate change, or LGBTQ+ rights. Businesses hold significant influence and can drive meaningful change by aligning values with actions. Responsible activism fosters confidence with socially conscious consumers and employees; being silent can suggest complicity. However, there are many risks and rewards for a organization to involve itself into politics. It cause their consumers to stop consuming their products and stop spending money. It also can retain loyal consumers.

Photo Courtesy Internet Reputation Management

Rewawrds of Standing on Social Issues

Rewards for organizations that take a stand on social issues and enhance their reputation come in many forms. According to Beaubien (2023), “Those benefits include improved financial performance; better ability to attract and retain top talent; and the power to drive purchase and investment decisions and sustain what the report calls “’a company’s permission to operate” (p.1). Corporate activism can also increase staff motivation, draw purpose-driven customers, and help brand loyalty. When big corporations like the NBA take a stand, for instance, as Black Lives Matter demonstrates, their dedication to ideals beyond profit fosters confidence and a closer emotional bond with their audience. Big corporations that are actively involved in social and political issues can also differentiate their brand in competitive markets, which may enhance public relations and inspire creative ideas grounded in ethical responsibility and long-term sustainability.

Photo Courtesy CNN

Risks of CSA Standing on Social Issues

According to PRSAY (2022), “For organizations, speaking out on controversial topics invites the risk of alienating people and damaging brand reputations. Even as more companies and communicators report taking sides on controversial and divisive social issues, those positions sometimes make people angry” (p.1). Furthermore, if the activism seems theatrical or at odds with a company’s policies, it may generate charges of hypocrisy or “woke-washing,” so compromising the credibility of the company and its brand. The possibility of politicization is another major concern.  Even well-meaning advocacy can turn a lightning point for controversy in the polarized society of today.  This could lead to viral social media criticism, protests, or boycotts that draw attention away from the main activities of the business. However, there is hope to change polarization. According to PRSAY (2022), “ More than three-fourths of PR professionals surveyed said polarization challenges their communication goals. At the same time, 85 percent believe that business can help reduce polarization in society” (p.1). Good business is good for the community. It will help heal some open wounds we have in our society. 

Photo Courtsesy Open Democracy

Sources

https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/the-evolution-of-corporate-activism-with-guest/id1677375263?i=1000650064877

https://www.prsa.org/article/report-corporate-reputation-never-more-important-nor-more-fragile

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén