Importance of Transparency in Crisis Communication
As discussed in Molly McPherson’s crisis communication podcast, transparency is a fundamental aspect of effective crisis communication. When crises arise, an organization’s decision to be open, truthful, and forthcoming with information can significantly influence its reputation and public trust. Transparent communication builds credibility with the public, helps mitigate backlash, and establishes long-term trust. By addressing issues quickly, sharing factual information, and maintaining consistent messaging, organizations can shape narratives, minimize damage, and demonstrate a commitment to accountability and empathy.
When organizations prioritize transparency during crises, they show accountability and empathy towards affected parties. This not only reassures the public but also highlights the organization’s willingness to confront and correct any issues directly, laying the groundwork for recovery and the restoration of public confidence. The importance of this timeless principle is evident across industries, where many organizations have learned that being “transparent during challenging times transforms crises into opportunities for rebuilding and growth” (Molly McPherson’s Crisis Communication Podcast, ep-32, 2021).
Johnson & Johnson’s Response to the Tylenol Crisis
One of the most renowned examples of transparency in crisis management is Johnson & Johnson’s handling of the Tylenol poisoning crisis in 1982. When it was discovered that several people had tragically died from cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules, Johnson & Johnson immediately pulled 31 million bottles off shelves, stopped production, and halted advertising. Rather than concealing the issue, the company prioritized public safety and communicated openly with the media, healthcare professionals, and the public.
Similarly, The New York Times covered the Tylenol crisis extensively, emphasizing how Johnson & Johnson’s transparent messaging allowed them to control the narrative, “reinforcing trust among consumers and demonstrating the long-term value of transparency” (Rehak, 2002). Their strategy remains a model for organizations navigating crises, showing that open communication can turn potentially devastating events into moments of leadership and resilience.

Another example of transparent crisis management is Starbucks’ response to a racial profiling incident in 2018. When two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks for simply sitting at the location without making a purchase, the incident went viral and sparked widespread outrage. In response, Starbucks’ CEO Kevin Johnson quickly issued a public apology, met personally with the affected individuals, and closed more than 8,000 U.S. stores for a day to conduct racial bias training for employees. By acknowledging the issue, taking responsibility, and showing a genuine commitment to change, Starbucks reinforced its dedication to inclusivity and transparency, which helped repair public trust and demonstrate accountability. According to Forbes, this move not only showcased transparent crisis handling but also “served as an industry-leading example of addressing social issues head-on“(Gourguechon, 2018).

The Role of Transparent Messaging in Modern Crisis Management
Today, the need for transparency in crisis management is even more pronounced due to the speed at which information spreads across social media. Organizations must act quickly with clear, transparent messages to mitigate reputational damage and counter misinformation. For instance, companies like Facebook, when confronted with cybersecurity breaches, have needed to issue swift statements detailing the nature of the breach, the affected data, and measures taken to protect user information. This demonstrates that modern organizations must combine transparency with speed to maintain public trust in a digital era.
Conclusion
Transparency remains a cornerstone of effective crisis communication. From Johnson & Johnson’s historical crisis response to Starbucks’ proactive handling of social issues and modern digital challenges, being transparent builds trust, reduces panic, and shapes public perception positively. Public relations professionals must prioritize transparent strategies to build and maintain public confidence during challenging times.
Sources:
Gourguechon, P. (2018, May 7). The psychology of apology: How did Starbucks’ CEO Kevin Johnson do? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/prudygourguechon/2018/05/06/the-psychology-of-apology-how-did-starbucks-ceo-kevin-johnson-do/
Rehak, J., & Tribune, I. H. (2002, March 23). Tylenol made a hero of Johnson & Johnson : The recall that started them all. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/23/your-money/IHT-tylenol-made-a-hero-of-johnson-johnson-the-recall-that-started.html
The PR breakdown with Molly McPherson ep-32 Crisis Communications with Molly McPherson. The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson. (2021, May 10). https://www.prbreakdownpodcast.com/