PR Research: Effectiveness and Importance
The dynamic field of public relations greatly depends on research to guide tactics and gauge effectiveness. This blog post covers effective practices in PR research and looks at a noteworthy campaign failure that was attributable to inadequate research.
When public relations research is conducted correctly, bias should be eliminated and the leaders of companies should have a better vision of how the public perceives their organization (Chron Contributor).
Episode 97 of the PR Talk Podcast with Amy Rosenberg featured the owner of Big Small Brands, Jen Barth, to talk marketing and public relations research. There are multiple different ways to gather and analyze research and information. Different examples of research include primary research, qualitative research, interviews, quantitative research and secondary research (USC Annenberg, 2023).
“What I tend to focus on and where I think PR folks are finding more and more value over the last couple of years is in that sort of primary research, right? Because nothing can really replace the value of just a direct one-on-one conversation.” (Rosenberg, Barth, 2020, 4:10)
Public Relations research is very complex and needs to be thorough in order to obtain the most accurate and effective results. There are many different reasons that public relations research is necessary. Public Relations Research is necessary because it provides the initial information that’s essential to plan public relations actions. It is also necessary because it provides the means to assess a public relations plan’s effectiveness (Moore, 2024, Public Relations Research).

What NOT To Do: Crisis Management and Audience Engagement
One example of a huge crisis management fail was the Deepwater Horizon oil leak. On April 20, 2010, the oil drilling rig Deepwater Horizon that operated in the Gulf of Mexico exploded and sank. In the history of marine oil drilling operations, this was the largest oil spill yet. The explosion resulted in the death of 11 workers. The United States filed a complaint in District Court against BP Exploration and Production among others as being responsible for the incident (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2024).
BP failed across the board in crisis management in multiple aspects. BP executives immediately declared it was not their fault nor their accident. They blamed their contractors, which made the company look extremely arrogant (NPR, 2011). A huge reason that the company was striking out so badly in terms of their public relations efforts was because their CEO, Tony Hayward, had cut the public and government relations sectors to save costs. Hayward in turn was getting his advice from outside sources and rookies who gave him poor advice. He repeatedly made insensitive comments such as, “There’s no one who wants this thing over more than I do . You know, I’d like my life back” (NPR 2011). Hayward’s ability to always say the wrong thing made him a bad choice to be the face of the crisis and it took BP a little too long to realize that (NPR, 2011).
In my opinion, there was a lot the public relations professionals behind this situation could have done differently. Firstly, a rooted problem that I think was a horrible idea was cutting the public and government relations sectors. When you’re a massive company like that, it’s essential to have a strong public relations team in case of a crisis such as the one they experienced. I think it’s also essential to be upfront and honest with your publics. Hayward came off as arrogant, insensitive, and a liar. It was worse that the company tried to lie when the publics seemingly knew the truth. It also would’ve been beneficial for BP to have had a representative who had better media training. Hayward could’ve had a better chance of making the company look better if he would’ve had better media training or even tried in the slightest to have genuine empathy for the people effected. There should have been a crisis communication plan for something like that, which is a reasonable ask considering the line of work involved.There were a lot of things that could’ve been done better and a lot of essential research that could’ve been done to help BP handle the situation better and better understand the publics.

Key Words/Tags
PR research, effectiveness, crisis communication, audience engagement
References
Chron. (n.d.). How Is Research Important to Strategic Public Relations Plans? Small Business – Chron.com. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/research-important-strategic-public-relations-plans-15586.html
EPA. (2019). Deepwater Horizon – BP Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/deepwater-horizon-bp-gulf-mexico-oil-spill
Moore, J. (2024). OU Sign In. Ou.edu. https://canvas.ou.edu/courses/355766/files/110983238?module_item_id=6945948
Rosenberg, M. (2020, December 2). Mike Rosenberg. Veracity Marketing. https://www.veracityagency.com/podcast/pr-research/
Shogren, E. (2011, April 21). BP: A Textbook Example Of How Not To Handle PR. Npr.org. https://www.npr.org/2011/04/21/135575238/bp-a-textbook-example-of-how-not-to-handle-pr
USC. (2023, November 15). 4 Research Methods for Audience Analysis | USC Online Communication Degree. Communicationmgmt.usc.edu. https://communicationmgmt.usc.edu/blog/4-research-methods-for-audience-analysis