Sav's Blog

When I first started blogging for this course, I wasn’t sure what to expect. At first, it felt unnatural and I was uncertain, it was very different from the structured writing I was used to. But over time, I realized that that was one of its main purposes. Blogging encouraged me to explore ideas more personally and reflectively. 

So the question is did I blog enough to get comfortable? Almost. I blogged regularly but not quite enough to make it a second nature. Still I believe the process helped me grow as a writer. I became more reflective and it helped build a little confidence in my writing in my own voice. I stopped overthinking and just wrote how I felt.

I would say when it came to feedback it was a little limited, though when I was given feedback it was very valuable. Even without a lot of direct responses, knowing there was an audience made me more thoughtful about what I wrote. I think if there was more structured feedback could have helped me push my writing further.

What worked best was the way blogging helped me connect ideas, what we learned in class, and things on a more personal level. If I could change anything, I’d post more frequently and include more interaction. Overall, blogging became something that I grew to like, it helped me develop my voice within my writing. I didn’t blog perfectly, but I definitely think I grew as a writer, which is my ultimate takeaway.

How AI Has Helped Me – A Personal Reflection

Ok, I’ll be the first to admit, when AI first started to get popular I did understand what all the fuss was about. When people talked about Artificial intelligence, I always immediately thought of those robots I would see in sci-fi movies like the film “AI” with Will Smith. Where robots had taken over the world. But over time, I’ve come to realize that AI is much simpler than that, it can be something more practical and life changing. One of the most impactful ways AI has helped is with school. In class we had a lot of discussions about how AI is being used in education. We talked about how it’s not just a tool for big corporations or tech companies but something that can be used as an asset to students like me. Whether that would eb understanding complicated instructions or using grammarly to correct my run on sentences and misspelled words.

Help With Instructions:

After being in school for the past 14 years of my life, I recently caught on how confusing some teachers explain their instruction. I’ve had my fair share of assignments where I looked at the directions and completely went blank and I didn’t understand a single thing my teacher was telling me (Specifically in High school).  AI, like sir or the google AI thing has helped me break down confusing instructions into more simpler terms. If you think about it like having a tutor but online, with the ability to explain things when needed in a way that makes sense to students.

Grammar Corrections – A Lifesaver for Writing

 Let’s be honest, writing doesn’t always come naturally to everyone. If there is one thing I struggled with besides math it was punctuation and grammar when I was writing papers. Writing essays, research papers or even blog posts like this, I’m always very anxious because I know I am bound to make some form of grammatical error. But thanks to AI such as Grammar those mistakes are not as nerve racking anymore. AI  has always had a way of explaining why something is incorrect, offering suggestions for improvement. It’s given me the chance to learn from my mistakes and become a better writer. Over time, I’ve noticed a difference in how I approach writing, and my confidence has grown. AI doesn’t just catch errors – it helps me understand why something works better than another option, making me more aware of the rules without feeling like I’m being scolded for every mistake.

AI and GPS – A Game Changer for Navigation

One the very first times I can recall using AI was with GPS. My mom always tells me the horror stories of when she first got her license there was no such thing as GoogleMaps or Siri, she had to find places using a Map.  Although I’ve never experienced life where I had to use a map to get from one place to the next, I couldn’t imagine where I would be. I would probably end up in Canada trying to use a map, I’m 90% sure I don’t even know how to read a map. So when I finally got my license and had the ability to use something much simpler like GPS, oh I was ecstatic.  Getting around is 10 times easier because of AI. It isn’t really about it being technology, it is about convenience and a smoother journey and less stressful. Now don’t be fooled, sometimes AI can be just as tricky as a map especially if there is no cell service.

AI Doesn’t Have to Be a Weapon – It’s Here to Help

In class, I discussed with my classmate, and we talked about how AI isn’t something to fear or view as a weapon. Sure, like anything in this world, it can be used in ways that are not always positive, but AI also has potential for good things as well. When used the right way, and not abused, it can be used as a tool that helps not cripples us. Whether it enhances our education, makes our daily lives easier, it just offers a tad bit more support.  For me, AI was not a weapon, it has helped improve my writing and navigate more easily, especially being from Texas and coming to Norman for school.  I realized that it is not a robot that is going to take over everything, well, at least not yet. But a tool that people can use to help them.

“50 First Dates” – My All-Time Favorite Rom-Com

When it comes to romantic comedies, there are plenty of options like in my last post i talked about my least favorite so now i want to give the spotlight to my favorite of all time. “50 First Dates” holds the number one spot for my favorite Rom-Com. This film stars an all time duo Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore, has the perfect balance between heartwarming romance and laughing out loud humor. The magic of this movie lies in its ability to make me  smile and cry in an equal manner, all while making sure I believed that love can happen in the most unlikely circumstances.

A Unique Love Story:

This movie tells the story of Henry Roth (played by Adam Sandler), a player who falls in love with small town girl Lucy Whitmore (played by Drew Barrymore), a woman who suffers from short-memory loss. Each day, she wakes up with no memory of the previous day, meaning that every day that she met Henry she would forget, so he made it his mission to win her heart over every single day. This storyline alone is both heart-warming and charming, because it does not follow the typical “boy meets girl they fall in love” story, but instead it’s a tale of perseverance, creativity and devotion.

The dynamic between Henry and Lucy ultimately made me keep coming to watch this film over and over. It’s another one of my comfort movies. Henry’s determination to help Lucy fall in love with each day is both funny and touching. Adam sandler has some of the best comedic timing which brings light to the otherwise dark situation and, Drew Barrymore’s Portray of Lucy was beautiful and showed the charters vulnerability. She made her character have the ability to resonate with anyone who has had to work through life challenges.

The Perfect Blend:

One of the main reasons “50 First Dates” stands out as my favorite rom-com is its ability to seamlessly balance humor and romance. The comedy never feels forced and it doesn’t completely detract from the emotional depth of the storyline. From Adam Sandlers portal of quirky antics to win Drew Barrymore’s character over, to his friends and family. However, It’s not all about jokes. The romance in this film always warmed my heart. Every time Henry found some silly way to make Lucy fall in love, I couldn’t help but be swept up in the sweetness of it all.  Although I talk about how hilarious this movie is, it’s also a story about genuine love and sacrifice.

A Movie I Watched Almost Every Day:

Growing up, my dad loved to collect DVDs and “ 50 First Date” was one the first movies I watched from his collection and I instantly fell in love.  I had this movie on rotation between the lion king. I must have watched it hundreds of times, I never got tired of it. To be honest I don’t think I ever will. I watched it any chance that I could.  There was just something about, by now I’m 100% positive I can recite the entire thing by heart. So now when I watch the movie now, it feels like home. For me. Watching this film wasn’t about the plot; it was about the memories of spending time with my family. It became a movie that me and my siblings all watched together, quote endlessly. There will always be a special place in my heart for this movie.

A Timeless Classic:

 As time has passed, this fill has remained my all time favorite rom-com. It is a film that will never feel outdated or over watched. In fact it has become more endearing to watch. It has all the elements I love about this specific genre: a quirky love story, an unforgettable cast, moments of emotion and of course the best part, the hilarious jokes. If you’ve never seen it ( which I hope everyone reading this has), I highly recommend giving it a watch. Personally it is a 10/10 film of course it is a little corny but name what rom-com that is not. It’s one of those movies that will always stick with you, and you’ll find yourself thinking about it whenever you’re in a mood for a feel-good film.

Overall, “50 First Dates” is more than just a romantic comedy;  to me it was a movie that taught me the value of patience, devotion and the beauty of starting something new with and for the people we are about. Whether you’re a hopeless romantic or just looking for a movie to make you laugh, this film is an absolute must-watch. For me, it’s not just a favorite – it’s a timeless classic that I’ll continue to love, laugh, and learn from for years to come.

Annotated Bibliography:

This article by Lukas Shaw talks about how Adam Cononver dives into the growing concerns surrounding artificial intelligence and its potential to disrupt the Film/entertainment industry, particularly in the context of Hollywood’s ongoing Labor dispute, Conover, who is considered to be a comedian and writer, explores  how AI being used by studios is seen as a threat to the livelihoods of writers, actor and other creative in Hollywood. Through interviews with many professionals and labor representatives, Conover  illustrates the fear that AI might replace human jobs, from scriptwriting to acting.  He also discusses how these concerns have contributed to one of the largest labor disputes in Hollywood in decades(Shaw). Conover, a prominent figure in both comedy and Hollywood, provides a comprehensive overview of the conflict between the entertainment unions and the studios. His insights are grounded in the economic realities of streaming, where profits have gone down, and AI promises to reduce costs for production studios. I will be using this article primarily to examine where the lines became blurred between technology, labor rights and intellectual property, especially how the advancement of AI might shape the future of creative professions in Hollywood. Conover’s exploration of the existential crisis faced by writers and actors due to AI will help contextualize my research on how new technologies disrupt traditional industries and labor markets(page 1). This article offers an important lens through which I can view the changing dynamics of the creative world economically, highlighting both the promises and dangers of AI in the film industry(page 1).  According to Conover AI is not just a tool but a potential job destroyer which is a critical perspective that I will use in my analysis of what AI will do to jobs in hollywood. Although my main point is AI causing a decrease in human jobs in Hollywood, the way conover discusses the surrounding consent, control and intellectual property rights interest me to use it as a tool to further my analysis.

• SHAW, L. Artificial Intelligence. Bloomberg Businessweek, [s. l.], n. 4792, p. 32–35, 2023. Disponível em: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b5b9a1b7-3198-3881-b079-e439719fa394. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

2.)  This article explores the growing influence of generative AI in Hollywood, focusing on the tension between traditionally filmmaking practices and technological advancements reshaping the industry.  The author Peter Suderman begins by using Tom Cruise’s famous insistence of performing his students as in Mission impossible  to symbolize Hollywood’s resistance to digital effects and AI. He talks about how Crusie being considered “no digital Tom” reflects a larger fear from those in the industry about the potential of AI replacing real people, particularly actors and writers(page 1). The article also highlights the 2023 writers and actors strike, which were fueled by concerns over AI potentially taking everyone’s jobs and them being paid lower wages. The screen actors and writers of America stood against those who were trying to use AI to manipulate actors and create scripts without human input. The article goes on to discuss the contrasting response to AI, noting that while many in Hollywood fear job loss, AI is also seen as a useful tool, especially for organizing and structuring screenplays. The author cites predictions from industry figures like Jeffery Katenbery(page 1), who anticipates that AI will drastically reduce the cost of animated films and other higher production. Suderman then dives into how AI might change the power dynamic within Hollywood; many people will lose their positions of power.  This article is crucial for undertaking the current debate surrounding AI in the film industry, particularly its impact on labor, creativity and accessibility. It provides a more nuanced perspective on bothe the challenges and opportunities  that will happen when AI is further introduced into the industry. Although my interest is more focused on the disadvantages of AI, having articles that will be able to contrast my research on how AI could shape the future of filmmaking, especially when it comes to cost, autonomy for independent filmmakers and the future creative work that will come in hollywood.

• SUDERMAN, P. AI Is Coming for Hollywood’s Jobs. Reason, [s. l.], v. 56, n. 2, p. 66–71, 2024. Disponível em: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b2eaa3ff-ae0d-338a-860f-ebbea499d8bf. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

Citations:

Works Cited

Cho, Winston. “Hollywood Jobs Most At-Risk From AI.” The Hollywood Reporter, 30 January 2024, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/ai-hollywood-workers-job-cuts-1235811009/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

Chow, Pei. “Necsus.” Ghost in the (Hollywood) Machine: Emergent Applications of Artifical Intelligence in the Film Industry, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, p. 22. Google Scholar, file:///C:/Users/savan/Downloads/content.pdf. Accessed 05 March 2025.

Davenport, Thomas H., and Randy Bean. “The Impact of Generative AI on Hollywood and Entertainment | Thomas H. Davenport and Randy Bean.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 19 June 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-hollywood-and-entertainment/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

CAMPBELL, A. B.C. film and TV industry divided on future use of AI: Some unions are calling for stricter regulations, while others look to navigate adoption. Business in Vancouver, [s. l.], n.  1838, p. 11, 2025. Disponível em:https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=4745caa3-a77f-3e05-94e0-405c1f6913da. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

Annotated Bib: (Part 2)-

1. Citation: Halperin, Rosner, Brett, Daniela. “AI is Soulless: Hollywood Workers Strike and Emerging Perception of Generative Cinema.” ACM Transaction on Computer-Human Interactions, vol. 1, no. 1073-0516, 2025, p. 26. google scholar, https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3716135. Accessed 26 March 2025.

I resonated with this article because it investigates the reason behind the 2023 strikes by Hollywood Film workers,  focusing on how the growing influence of artificial intelligence within the concerns about job security, wages and the authenticity of creative work. The authors  conducted participant observations, standing at the front lines of the strike/ march  where they interviewed 15 different film workers all from different career paths such as actor, film producer, writer and directors. These workers expressed their fears about how they believe AI might worsen wage pressure and completely erase the personal connection that is created during the creativity processes. It undermines the Originality and authenticity of cinematic productions. It is also expressed in the article from those being interviewed that AI could lead to movies and films being produced a lot faster than normal, which will potentially sacrifice quality and will only leave room for quantity.

This source directly supports my argument that AI is contributing to the reduction of Human Labor in the Hollywood Film industry. The film workers that were interviewed in this study each describe ways AI threaten their livelihood, whether that through replacing jobs, lower wage pay or altering the creative process. The articles also highlight some of the historical aspects pertaining to technology and its fast advancements. But at the same time suggested that just like in the past where people were on edge about the creation of CGI or HD quality they eventually got over it because these technological advancements eventually led to new roles that people could work in.  This perspective can be used to understand the ongoing resistance towards AI in Hollywood, as well as the more extensive implication of AI’s influence on the creativity and the workforce in the entertainment industry. 

Some key points that I will take away from this article is how AI is just mostly feared because it is presumed to make wages in Hollywood tighter.  Workers are also very concerned with the fact that with the production of each film that uses AI, the film will have no substance. Another takeaway is that people in the film industry truly believe that AI will completely and utterly reshape the “soul” of cinematic labor. This study provides valuable firsthand accounts from a variety of workers in the film industry offering insight on the real world impact of AI on labor dynamics. This article is an essential resource for understanding the direct consequences of AI on Hollywood’s workforce and the ongoing resistance from those working in the industry. It contributes to a  much more universal conversation about AI’s role in the entertainment industry and the potential long term effects it will have on the human labor force in film production.

2.) Citation: Kinder, Molly. “Hollywood writers went on strike to protect their livelihoods from generative AI. Their remarkable victory matters for all workers.” Brookings, The Brooking Institution, 12 April 2024, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/hollywood-writers-went-on-strike-to-protect-their-livelihoods-from-generative-ai-their-remarkable-victory-matters-for-all-workers/. Accessed 26 March 2025.

Just like my other sources this article explores the disruptive effects of generative AI on Hollywood, particularly the concerns that have been raised by writers. It highlights the fears that each writer in the industry has felt at some point due to the belief that their jobs are at risk due to growing capabilities of AI technologies (Ex: ChatGbt). The article begins to feature a variety of interviews with writers such as Danny Trolli, who express concern that AI could replace them and destroy long established career paths in the industry. The article also brings to light the 2023 Writers Guild of America(WGA) strike, whose main focus was attempting to secure protection from AI.  This strike eventually led to some form of reaction from those who own production companies such as a contract ensuring that AI is just a tool that is used sometimes but it cannot and will not ever fully replace humans.

This is relevant to my argument that AI is contributing to the downfall of Hollywood’s film industry by threatening jobs and eroding film creativity. It seems like everything these days has the same concept.  The firsthand accounts from the writers provided a very valuable perspective about the risk AI poses to the workforce. It emphasizes that AI has become more advanced in generating script and “creative” content just as though it was being done by a human might detrimental to the world of Hollywood. It also compliments my other sources, which focuses on how AI is putting workers at risk in various sectors, especially in the creative and wage department in the film industry. 

Some key points that I  have taken away from this article is that Hollywood writers live in constant fear that one day they will be replaced by a robot. As well as the 2023 writer strike led to something historic, a contract that will prevent studios from abusing their accessibility to AI. This article is a strong source because it provides personal flights from Hollywood writers as well.  However the article could have had a more balanced perspective, regarding how AI might not take over the industry but just provide it with some assistance. Despite this, the article effectively conveys the economic and creative concerns that AI introduces into the industry, making it a valuable resource for my research.

The academic source will become essential in supporting my argument that AI is a serious threat to the Hollywood film industry. It offers valuable insights  into the concerns of professionals within the industry and the protective measures that can be taken to prevent the industry’s fears from coming true. This source will ultimately strengthen my overall research by connecting the overall theme of AI’s impact on the workforce with specific people and examples. It is also providing further evidence on how it is possible to jeopardize creative workers in Hollywood.

Works Cited

Augiano, Dani. “How Hollywood triumphed AI- and Why It Matters.” The Guardian [Los Angeles], 01 October 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/oct/01/hollywood-writers-strike-artificial-intelligence. Accessed 26 March 2025.

Cho, Winston. “Hollywood Jobs Most At-Risk From AI.” The Hollywood Reporter, 30 January 2024, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/ai-hollywood-workers-job-cuts-1235811009/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

Chow, Pei. “Necsus.” Ghost in the (Hollywood) Machine: Emergent Applications of Artifical Intelligence in the Film Industry, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, p. 22. Google Scholar, file:///C:/Users/savan/Downloads/content.pdf. Accessed 05 March 2025.

Davenport, Thomas H., and Randy Bean. “The Impact of Generative AI on Hollywood and Entertainment | Thomas H. Davenport and Randy Bean.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 19 June 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-hollywood-and-entertainment/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

George, Dr.A Shaji. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Job Loss.” Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, vol. 02, no. 02, 20204, p. 21. Purip.com, https://puirp.com/index.php/research/article/view/46/40. Accessed 26 March 2025.

Halperin, Rosner, Brett, Daniela. “AI is Soulless: Hollywood Workers Strike and Emerging Perception of Generative Cinema.” ACM Transaction on Computer-Human Interactions, vol. 1, no. 1073-0516, 2025, p. 26. google scholar, https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3716135. Accessed 26 March 2025.

Kinder, Molly. “Hollywood writers went on strike to protect their livelihoods from generative AI. Their remarkable victory matters for all workers.” Brookings, The Brooking Institution, 12 April 2024, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/hollywood-writers-went-on-strike-to-protect-their-livelihoods-from-generative-ai-their-remarkable-victory-matters-for-all-workers/. Accessed 26 March 2025.

SUDERMAN, P. AI Is Coming for Hollywood’s Jobs. Reason, [s. l.], v. 56, n. 2, p. 66–71, 2024. Disponível em: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b2eaa3ff-ae0d-338a-860f-ebbea499d8bf. Acesso em: 6 March. 2025.

As artificial intelligence continues to advance. It started as something small but has reached a whole new level. This raises important questions about how AI will affect job opportunities in Hollywood.  AI has already influenced the industry in terms of jobs. As AI continues to advance in the film industry, I wonder if it has the potential to put human workers out of business. Will it make jobs more challenging to find, or will it make it easier? A specific job that could be at risk is directing. AI has the potential to put humans who have to be physically present to produce a movie, to lose their jobs to non-human technology as it progresses in the world. People are hoping to make AI more advanced to the point where a human is not needed for any task, which will cause a big problem in Hollywood.  My research will explore the impact of AI on the film industry’s workforce and direct creativity by reading academic journals and articles that discuss the changes in Hollywood and the effects of AI. One of the main sources I will use is a journal by Pei Chow that will be able to provide me with further credibility. This journal further answers my theory on whether AI has ultimately taken over the film industry and the job turmoil that they may face. Another source I will be exploring throughout my research is an article by Lucas Shaw, which tells the story of Adam, a man in the film industry who participated in the Writers Guild Act because many writers had lost their jobs to script-writing AI. All of the sources address the livelihood impact of AI on film and what film can do for AI.

When I think of AI, there are always these particular instances that remind that make me feel about what life would be like if generative AI was never created. It reminds me of how hard it has made those in the education system work 10 times harder, whether that is from the point of view of a teacher or student. However, since I’ve currently been through the many stages of AI being developed and it was a big problem when I was in high school, it’s only fair that I talk about it from the perspective of a student.

At first, when generative AI was first introduced people saw it as something strange and as if it was a technological robot that was invading the earth (a tad bit overdramatic if you ask me but sure). I watched as everyone began to panic, the fear set in that students would officially have something at the palm of their hands that could prevent them from actually learning. However, the art of learning died long before the invention of AI. Oddly enough blame can be set upon a variety of groups (parents, students, hell even teachers) we have reached a point in society where students don’t want to learn, while parents and teachers are not willing to teach or guide the children anymore. So, if we think about it honestly AI was never to problem. But of course, when it comes to adults, parents, and educators alike. AI is the first thing they point their fingers at. This brings me to my next point.

There were 2 instances where AI almost ruined someone’s life and one of them involved me while the other involved this girl from a TikTok. In my senior year of high school, I had an assignment that had to be a 5-page essay ” about something or someone who impacted my life. After I had turned in my essay, my teacher accused me of using Chat GPT to produce my essay and proceeded to give me a 50 on it. However, what this teacher failed to realize was that I had put a lot of handwork and hours into conducting that essay was not written by AI but just well well-written essay that I wanted to make about my life. Something personal to me was ruined because my teacher automatically assumed that I had plagiarized my entire essay, simply because and I quote ” This was just too well written for someone your age.” This teacher invalidated my essay because it is easier to assume someone is Plagiarizing ideas from AI than to just assume that students can be well-rounded and smart with the reliance on AI.

Another instance relates to a video I saw on TikTok a year or two ago, where a girl was almost expelled from her university because her professor assumed her essay was AI. When she had physically proven that she had spent hours completing her essay and he still didn’t believe her. All because the AI scanner professors use said that her essay was 5% AI. Which is not even a valid enough percentage for a professor to accuse a student of plagiarism. So she had to go before the academic school board to prove her innocence. Where she was then reenrolled back into her university, without

I’m currently in a college class called Gutenberg GPT: Why write? Where we have discussed on multiple occasions AI vs the education system. If AI has destroyed the education system or is it just a tool that was created to help better the system?

Of course, I understand when people say that AI is ruining the education system, but I also stand with the fact that people’s fear of generative AI will also ruin it. It is an understatement when we talk about those taking advantage of AI, some people can’t complete a single assignment without the help of AI but that doesn’t mean that it applies to everyone. Which I think is where the problem comes. People or educators can just automatically assume a person has used AI just because it has become the new ” Normal”.

But I guess for now what I want y’all to take from this post is that AI was created as a potential tool to help with certain things. However, the fear of AI just has a potent impact on the education system. The true problem with AI is how society (particularly educators) reacts to it. They always seem to tend to automatically assume that AI is at fault. Hey, take it from someone with experience. Education should be about learning, growth and trust, but when fear takes over, it hinders that process. I truly believe that eventually that it will boil down to the future of education being balanced with advanced technology and human learning and teaching. But I’m no Fortune teller so I could always be wrong. AI should be used as a resource, not a scapegoat and that applies to both educators and students.

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it’s becoming increasingly clear that it’s changing the way we live, work, and interact with the world. I mean come on; most people cannot even complete something simply without using AI. But here I want to talk about how I’ve watched AI transform over the different stages of my life. There is a big difference between how my life was before everything became all about technology and how it has grown almost boring with its presence. They’ve created two major eras.

Life before the internet, technology, and social media if I could put it in two words, I would say AMAZING and COLORFUL. A time when my biggest issue was what lunch I was bringing to school the next day. A time when all of my time was spent outside running around with my siblings and the neighborhood kids. Where school was nothing but bright colors, recess, and pizza parties. I felt so much joy in years when the world wasn’t completely overrun with social media and AI. I am not going to say there weren’t any of those things around like YouTube, Facebook, and Vine but it wasn’t our whole life it was just filler.

In many ways, life without AI meant less convenience but more direct human interaction. In a way, it felt as though it was easier to connect with others just simply by walking outside your door. But now it has become much harder people have a lot of social anxiety and a basically glued to phones and do not know how to interact in real life. #Screenagers

Now in the year 2025, the world has lost its color. Which saddens me but understand that the world has to evolve, and it can’t be stagnant. The world has surrounded itself with the internet. I remember the time when in elementary school we would have story time and sit on the big alphabet rug but now after having a little sister who is currently in elementary school, they have screen time instead of Storytime which is completely mind-boggling to me. Technology has changed the trajectory of kids today especially how they learn.

This reminds me of the conversations I’ve had with my classmates in the “Gutenberg to GPT: why write? ” class. We have always had conversations that talk about the evolution of generative AI and how the world has changed so much. We touched on a lot of topics on whether AI is good for the world or if it just causing us harm.

So, when I think about it’s not AI that has changed the world, but just technology and the internet. AI has provided us with so many cool things and new advancements but has also ruined others. People can’t do small tasks without resorting to the internet or help from artificial intelligence. I great example of this was January 19th, 2025, when the government cut off TikTok for less than 24 hours and everyone practically went insane myself included. We all became attached to a social media app, and it was taken from us we all lost our minds, to say the least.

Now when it comes to AI it has not always been used most appropriately. There was a time when people were using it to expose others and dox celebrities, influence, and even sometimes just ordinary. I remember when a famous women rapper, was getting exposed for things that were not he, instead, it was someone who created AI pictures and videos of her and sent them out to the public to humiliate her. So, in that instance, I think this is when AI plays a very dangerous part in our world.

With that being said AI does not have to be completely taken out of our lives but I do believe that it needs to be monitored to the point where people are not afraid of it.

As I reflect on the evolution of AI and technology, I realize how much our lives have changed, for better and for worse. While AI has brought many advancements and conveniences, it has also made us more reliant on screens and less connected to the world around us. I believe that technology, including AI, should be embraced but with caution. In some way, somehow, we need to find a balance where we can use AI for its benefits while still maintaining real human connections and interactions. So basically, what I’m trying to say is that we must monitor its use, so we don’t lose sight of the things that make life colorful and meaningful.

Romantic comedies have always been a guilty pleasure of mine, where they offer a romance with a dose of humor and the predictable story that love will prevail. However, every so often, a movie comes along that makes me question  why I ever liked the genre in the first place. For me, that movie is Something Borrowed, directed by Luke Greenfield and was released in 2011. Despite the amazing star cast and seemingly promising premise, it quickly became my least favorite romance movie. Here is why.

1. Problematic characters 

At the heart of any romance movie is the audience’s ability to connect with the characters. Unfortunately, something borrowed offers a cast of characters that are just impossible to empathize with. The protagonist, Rachel( played by Ginnifer Goodwin), finds herself in a love triangle with her Best friend Darcy(played by Kate Hudson) and Darcy’s fiance Dex(Colin Egglesfield). 

Rachel, in particular, is a frustrating character. She spends much of the movie torn between doing what she knows is morally right and giving in to her feelings for Dex. While the movie tries to present Rachel as a relatable underdog, she often comes off as passive and indecisive, making decisions that feel more selfish than heroic. On the other hand, Darcy is a shallow, self-centered character, and while she may be entertaining in her arrogance, she doesn’t really evolve in a meaningful way throughout the film.

What’s most frustrating about something borrowed is that none of the main characters seem particularly likeable or admirable. It’s hard to root for anyone when they all act in ways that make me cringe or shake my head.

2. Lack of morality

One of the key elements of something borrowed is the moral dilemma faced by Rachel. She finds herself in love with dex, her best friend’s fiance and struggles with whether or not to act on those feelings. The movie attempts to explore themes of infidelity, loyalty and love. However, it fails to address the issues in a meaningful or mature way.

One of the key elements of Something Borrowed is the moral dilemma faced by Rachel. She finds herself in love with Dex, her best friend’s fiancé, and struggles with whether or not to act on those feelings. The movie attempts to explore themes of infidelity, loyalty, and love. However, it fails to address these issues in any meaningful or mature way.

Instead of giving a deeper reflection on the consequences of these actions, the movie opts for easy resolutions that don’t deal with the emotional weight of the decisions the characters are making. The ending, in particular, feels like a cop-out, with everything wrapped up neatly without ever truly addressing the complexity of the relationships involved. This leaves a sour taste, as the movie seems more interested in maintaining its rom-com formula than confronting real emotional stakes.

3. Predictable and Repetitive Plot

When it comes to romantic comedies, there’s a certain level of predictability that you have to accept. After all, the entire genre is built upon similar tropes: love triangles, the quirky best friend, the grand romantic gesture. However, something borrowed takes predictability to a whole new level which is ultimately really frustrating to see as a viewer. The plot goes by the book, it doesn’t leave any room for surprises or a plot twist. It is almost like driving on a long straight road for a long time.

The love triangle feels forced, with the characters Rachel and dex rehashing the same conversations over and over again. It became clear very early where the movie was heading, there was no real suspense or tension because it was all very obvious. The story could have been more interesting if had taken a risk or introduced a different perspective. Like if Rachel and her Best Friend ( played by john Kransiski) were to get together that would have been a less obvious choice of plot. But instead, it sticks to the same patterns that many other Rom-coms have done.

4. Missed Opportunities for Good Humor.

Romantic comedies are often known for their ability to make us laugh, whether through clever dialogue, awkward situations, or funny secondary characters. Something Borrowed, unfortunately, misses the mark in this department as well. While there are a few humorous moments scattered throughout the film, they feel forced and don’t land as well as they should.

The movie’s attempts at humor are often awkward, and the jokes feel stale. The humor is overshadowed by the melodrama, and even the lighthearted moments seem to fall flat. When a rom-com fails to deliver on both the romance and the comedy, it’s hard to justify why you should stick around for the rest of the film.

5. My least Favorite Part.

I think the reason this movie is truly considered my least favorite is because they use the plot in order to find happiness. The main character, who is supposed to be considered perfect and the better option, always has to find love by ruining someone else’s relationship or breaking someone else’s heart. Rachel was supposed to have been Darcy’s friend and although Darcy had her flaws she was self centered and then  became engaged to someone who Rachel was in love with. It should not have given Rachel the right to steal her best friend’s fiance or for Dex to cheat on Darcy because he found happiness with someone else Darcy did not deserve to be treated the way she was. 

Something Borrowed is the movie that leaves you wondering what could have been. With a lack of compelling characters, an overly predictable plot, and a failure to address its moral dilemmas meaningfully, it falls flat in nearly every department. While romantic comedies can be predictable, they should at least offer some fun or depth. Sadly, Something Borrowed does neither. That’s why it remains my least favorite movie. So ultimately, I hate romance movies that follow the trope of basically if I’m not happy no one can be, or that someone else has to suffer so the main character can get their happy ending.

This article by Lukas Shaw talks about how Adam Cononver dives into the growing concerns surrounding artificial intelligence and its potential to disrupt the Film/entertainment industry, particularly in the context of Hollywood’s ongoing Labor dispute, Conover, who is considered to be a comedian and writer, explores  how AI being used by studios is seen as a threat to the livelihoods of writers, actor and other creative in Hollywood. Through interviews with many professionals and labor representatives, Conover  illustrates the fear that AI might replace human jobs, from scriptwriting to acting.  He also discusses how these concerns have contributed to one of the largest labor disputes in Hollywood in decades(Shaw). Conover, a prominent figure in both comedy and Hollywood, provides a comprehensive overview of the conflict between the entertainment unions and the studios. His insights are grounded in the economic realities of streaming, where profits have gone down, and AI promises to reduce costs for production studios. I will be using this article primarily to examine where the lines became blurred between technology, labor rights and intellectual property, especially how the advancement of AI might shape the future of creative professions in Hollywood. Conover’s exploration of the existential crisis faced by writers and actors due to AI will help contextualize my research on how new technologies disrupt traditional industries and labor markets(page 1). This article offers an important lens through which I can view the changing dynamics of the creative world economically, highlighting both the promises and dangers of AI in the film industry(page 1).  According to Conover AI is not just a tool but a potential job destroyer which is a critical perspective that I will use in my analysis of what AI will do to jobs in hollywood. Although my main point is AI causing a decrease in human jobs in Hollywood, the way conover discusses the surrounding consent, control and intellectual property rights interest me to use it as a tool to further my analysis.

• SHAW, L. Artificial Intelligence. Bloomberg Businessweek, [s. l.], n. 4792, p. 32–35, 2023. Disponível em: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b5b9a1b7-3198-3881-b079-e439719fa394. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

2.)  This article explores the growing influence of generative AI in Hollywood, focusing on the tension between traditionally filmmaking practices and technological advancements reshaping the industry.  The author Peter Suderman begins by using Tom Cruise’s famous insistence of performing his students as in Mission impossible  to symbolize Hollywood’s resistance to digital effects and AI. He talks about how Crusie being considered “no digital Tom” reflects a larger fear from those in the industry about the potential of AI replacing real people, particularly actors and writers(page 1). The article also highlights the 2023 writers and actors strike, which were fueled by concerns over AI potentially taking everyone’s jobs and them being paid lower wages. The screen actors and writers of America stood against those who were trying to use AI to manipulate actors and create scripts without human input. The article goes on to discuss the contrasting response to AI, noting that while many in Hollywood fear job loss, AI is also seen as a useful tool, especially for organizing and structuring screenplays. The author cites predictions from industry figures like Jeffery Katenbery(page 1), who anticipates that AI will drastically reduce the cost of animated films and other higher production. Suderman then dives into how AI might change the power dynamic within Hollywood; many people will lose their positions of power.  This article is crucial for undertaking the current debate surrounding AI in the film industry, particularly its impact on labor, creativity and accessibility. It provides a more nuanced perspective on bothe the challenges and opportunities  that will happen when AI is further introduced into the industry. Although my interest is more focused on the disadvantages of AI, having articles that will be able to contrast my research on how AI could shape the future of filmmaking, especially when it comes to cost, autonomy for independent filmmakers and the future creative work that will come in hollywood.

• SUDERMAN, P. AI Is Coming for Hollywood’s Jobs. Reason, [s. l.], v. 56, n. 2, p. 66–71, 2024. Disponível em: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b2eaa3ff-ae0d-338a-860f-ebbea499d8bf. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

Citations:

Works Cited

Cho, Winston. “Hollywood Jobs Most At-Risk From AI.” The Hollywood Reporter, 30 January 2024, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/ai-hollywood-workers-job-cuts-1235811009/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

Chow, Pei. “Necsus.” Ghost in the (Hollywood) Machine: Emergent Applications of Artifical Intelligence in the Film Industry, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, p. 22. Google Scholar, file:///C:/Users/savan/Downloads/content.pdf. Accessed 05 March 2025.

Davenport, Thomas H., and Randy Bean. “The Impact of Generative AI on Hollywood and Entertainment | Thomas H. Davenport and Randy Bean.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 19 June 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-hollywood-and-entertainment/. Accessed 5 March 2025.

CAMPBELL, A. B.C. film and TV industry divided on future use of AI: Some unions are calling for stricter regulations, while others look to navigate adoption. Business in Vancouver, [s. l.], n.  1838, p. 11, 2025. Disponível em:https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=4745caa3-a77f-3e05-94e0-405c1f6913da. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2025.

As the use of Artificial intelligence continues in the world. There are important questions that arise about what the future of Hollywood will look like, whether will it transform filmmaking, and its impact on the workforce. AI has already influenced the industry ranging from scriptwriting and special effects to acting using technology. This shift in the industry has the potential to take away jobs that are done by humans, especially technical roles like visual effects and animations. However, it also presents new job opportunities where AI and humans can coexist such as being an AI specialist or designer. While AI is good for making films and being able to produce more efficient and faster work, it also challenges the nature of creativity in Hollywood. Some questions arise about how AI will influence storytelling, directing, acting, and editing. These are key areas where humans play the main role involving human intuitions and emotions. The future of creativity in filmmaking relies on whether AI will serve as a boost to help the industry or a crutch that will dull Hollywood’s creativity.

My research will explore the impact of AI on Hollywood’s workforce and creativity by reading articles that talk about AI in film finding case studies or films that used AI to create it and analyzing AI-driven films such as Where the Robots Grow (2024) and Mufasa: The Lion King (2024). My research will explore how access to AI can be both a risk and provide opportunities in film. It addresses ethical concerns such as who owns the property rights if it was created by technology and the potential misuse of AI to replicate actors/actresses. Ultimately, I aim to talk about AI’s role in the entertainment industry, exploring how Hollywood can adapt to technological advancements while maintaining creativity.